Some schools put all exams at the end of the year, while some other schools give exams throughout the whole year. What are the advantages and disadvantages of the two-exam system? Which one do you think is better?
Nowdays, the challenge in finding most suitable exam system has attracted numerous controversies and drawn the attention from the public. It can be agreed that put all exams at the end of year is a well practiced in many schools, while on the other hand stands a perspective that giving exams throughout the whole offer some other benefits. This essay will elaborate on both sides and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
There are many advantages of schedule exam at end of year and the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that students who are well versed in the entire course will be rewarded and those who fall behind could still have a chance to catch up. However, this system is not always supported. For example, some argue that cramming all exams at end can only inflict unnecessary stress to the students. This argument, however, is only partial true. Such exam format could bring forth overwhelming amount of pressure and excitement, which is an epitome of what many real-world experiences is about. As a result, put all exams at the end of the year is undoubtably positive for most peers.
Alternatively, the key justification for distributing exams throughout the whole year is that these exams are designed to effectively test students over specific topics, and the process from absorbing to assessing knowledge becomes a seamless learning experience despite its deceivingly fragmented approach. Nevertheless, there remains some disadvantages including absence of intense pressure and more critically, abysmal chances for fall behind students to catch up.
In the light of discussion above, it can be concluded that both exam systems are effective in their own right and school’s role in choosing best suited exam system for a particular course should not be overlooked.
